ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Intramuscular Midazolam Versus Intravenous Diazepam for Acute Seizure in Children
IM-midazolam in acute seizures, whenever IV cannulation is not possible. It is easy to administer and can be used in prehospital settings as IV cannulation requires experience, especially in pediatric age group. Moreover, the transit time to the hospital can be prolonged in our areas which can delay the treatment if intravenous cannulation is considered. More studies are required to assess the feasibility of administering IM-midazolam in a prehospital setting to control acute seizures
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Intranasal vs Buccal vs Intramuscular Midazolam for the Home and Emergency Treatment of Acute Seizures#1100679
- Comparison Between Melatonin and Diazepam for Prevention of Recurrent Simple Febrile Seizures#1114009
- Seizure Therapy With Intravenous Levetiracetam and Lorazepam#967413
- Single Dose of Clonazepam Versus Intermiittent Diazepam for Febrile Seizures Prevention#1127329
- Antiseizure Medication Prescription Patterns for Treatment of Post-Traumatic Epilepsy.#421034
Record · ID 852679
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive