Pulsed ElectRic FiEld Versus Cryoballoon for PAF

This study has been designed to compare the success rate of two different commercially available ablation technologies, namely PFA and Cryo. Both technologies are standard of care ablation procedures. An ablation is a procedure where a small piece of tissue of the heart, that. causes an irregular heartbeat, is heated or frozen (cryo-ablation) using a special type of catheter. Once you have signed this consent to take part of the study, you will be randomly assigned to one of the two ablation strategies (PFA versus Cryo). Randomization is a method that helps prevent any possible influence of human choices on clinical results and improve objectivity in research. The day of the procedure you will be undergo AF catheter ablation via either PFA or Cryo based on the results of randomization. Although both devices that will be used in this study are commercially approved, assessing the incidence of arrhythmia recurrence after ablation during follow-up is considered the investigational portion of the study. "Investigational" means that recurrence data will be collected after the cardiac ablation procedure and compared amongst the two standard of care ablation methods used to treat AF. This study will investigate how well PFA and Cryo work to prevent recurrences of atrial arrhythmias and if there are any differences between the two technologies