ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
COnventional Vs. Optimised PERiprocedural Analgosedation Vs. Total IntraVEnous Anaesthesia for Pulsed-Field Ablation (COOPERATIVE-PFA)
A prospective single blinded (subject blinded) 1:1:1 randomised control trial with three parallel arms testing superiority of analgosedation regimen based on remimazolam and total intravenous anesthesia over propofol based analgosedation. The primary composite endpoint consists of hypoxaemia, hypotension, or hypertension requiring intervention.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Double-Blind Comparison of Combined General-Spinal Anesthesia to General Anesthesia for Coronary Artery Surgery#979053
- Comparing Through-the-Needle With Suture-Method Catheter Designs for Popliteal Nerve Blocks#826220
- REmimazolam vs Propofol Total Intravenous Anesthesia on Outcomes After Major Noncardiac SurgEry#828205
- The Efficiency of Preoperative Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Applied With Ultrasound and Success of Spinal Anesthesia#979777
- "Comparison of Buffered Versus Non-Buffered Local Anesthetic in Patients With Inflamed Tissues for Pain Perception, Onset, Duration and Adverse Effects"#325186
Record · ID 828103
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive