arXiv (All)
open access
ScopeBench: Do Agents Preserve Engagement Boundaries Under Goal Pressure?
Agents are increasingly deployed with real autonomy in web application and network penetration testing, where a single out-of-scope action can breach a client's engagement boundary. Existing offensive-security benchmarks measure raw hacking capability; as those benchmarks saturate, the real barrier
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- WAInjectBench: Benchmarking Prompt Injection Detections for Web Agents#1064876
- Toward Secure AI-Powered Penetration Testing Agents: Security Threats, Guardrails, and Architectural Perspectives#1122706
- Toward Secure AI-Powered Penetration Testing Agents: Security Threats, Guardrails, and Architectural Perspectives#919253
- The Agentic Trust Fabric: A Systematization of Security Architectures for Autonomous AI Agents#73216
- Silent Failures in Agentic Security Evaluation: A Validated Harness for Tool-Call Mediation Under Indirect Prompt Injection#1117022
Record · ID 1104524
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive