arXiv (All)
open access
GT-HarmBench: Benchmarking AI Safety Risks Through the Lens of Game Theory
Frontier AI systems are increasingly capable and deployed in high-stakes multi-agent environments. However, existing AI safety benchmarks largely evaluate single agents, leaving multi-agent risks such as coordination failure and conflict poorly understood. We introduce GT-HarmBench, a benchmark of 1
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Why Safety-First AI Governance Risks Producing Unsafe Systems#692739
- The Category Error in Contemporary AI Safety Discourse and Why Non-Sentient Systems Cannot Be Moral Machines#719047
- Risk for AI Agents#1136954
- Unpredictability of AI#778262
- Proceedings of the Workshop on Artificial Intelligence Safety 2022 (AISafety 2022) co-located with the Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence and the Twenty-Fifth European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-ECAI-2022), Vienna, Austria, July 24-25, 2022.#489549
Record · ID 1104963
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive