arXiv (All)
open access
The Price of Thought: Does Test-Time Reasoning Pay in LLM Trading?
While inference-time reasoning in large language models (LLMs) promises better decision making, its higher computational cost may not yield better economic outcomes. Yet reasoning controls are rarely evaluated as economic interventions, where changes in model outputs must translate into better portf
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Can LLMs Replace Economic Choice Prediction Labs? The Case of Language-based Persuasion Games#612717
- Can LLMs Replace Economic Choice Prediction Labs? The Case of Language-based Persuasion Games#611240
- ASDA: Automated Skill Distillation and Adaptation for Financial Reasoning#985019
- Can LLMs Follow Medical Expert Logic? A Benchmark for Hierarchical Logical Consistency in Risk-of-Bias Assessment#998734
- Token Budget Saturation and Mechanistic Early Detection of Reasoning Non-Convergence in Chain-of-Thought Models#394406
Record · ID 1105264
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive