Conceptio › Archive › arXiv (All)
arXiv (All) open access

Can LLMs Replace Economic Choice Prediction Labs? The Case of Language-based Persuasion Games

Shapira, Eilam et al. · 2024 · arxiv_all
arXiv (All) · Papers · 2024
Open Source ↗Direct PDF ↓
artificial-intelligencecomputation-and-languagecomputer-science-and-game-theoryhuman-computer-interactionmachine-learning
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

[2401.17435] Can LLMs Replace Economic Choice Prediction Labs? The Case of Language-based Persuasion Games Skip to main content Search Submit Donate Log in Search arXiv Press Enter to search · Advanced search Computer Science > Machine Learning arXiv:2401.17435 (cs) [Submitted on 30 Jan 2024 ( v1 ), last revised 20 Nov 2025 (this version, v5)] Title: Can LLMs Replace Economic Choice Prediction Labs? The Case of Language-based Persuasion Games Authors: Eilam Shapira , Omer Madmon , Roi Reichart , Moshe Tennenholtz View a PDF of the paper titled Can LLMs Replace Economic Choice Prediction Labs? The Case of Language-based Persuasion Games, by Eilam Shapira and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract: Human choice prediction in economic contexts is crucial for applications in marketing, finance, public policy, and more. This task, however, is often constrained by the difficulties in acquiring human choice data. With most experimental economics studies focusing on simple choice settings, the AI community has explored whether LLMs can substitute for humans in these predictions and examined more complex experimental economics settings. However, a key question remains: can LLMs generate training data for human choice prediction? We explore this in language-based persuasion games, a complex economic setting involving natural language in strategic interactions. Our experiments show that models trained on LLM-generated data can effectively predict human behavior in these games and even outperform models trained on actual human data. Beyond data generation, we investigate the dual role of LLMs as both data generators and predictors, introducing a comprehensive empirical study on the effectiveness of utilizing LLMs for data generation, human choice prediction, or both. We then utilize our choice prediction framework to analyze how strategic factors shape decision-making, showing that interaction history (rather than linguistic sentiment alone) plays a key role in predicting human decision-making in repeated interactions. Particularly, when LLMs capture history-dependent decision patterns similarly to humans, their predictive success improves substantially. Finally, we demonstrate the robustness of our findings across alternative persuasion-game settings, highlighting the broader potential of using LLM-generated data to model human decision-making. Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG) ; Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC) Cite as: arXiv:2401.17435 [cs.LG] (or arXiv:2401.17435v5 [cs.LG] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.17435 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Related DOI : https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.21102 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources Submission history From: Eilam Shapira [ view email ] [v1] Tue, 30 Jan 2024 20:49:47 UTC (587 KB) [v2] Thu, 1 Feb 2024 18:57:18 UTC (601 KB) [v3] Thu, 7 Mar 2024 16:47:00 UTC (600 KB) [v4] Wed, 14 Aug 2024 19:23:43 UTC (2,063 KB) [v5] Thu, 20 Nov 2025 00:08:29 UTC (1,819 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Can LLMs Replace Economic Choice Prediction Labs? The Case of Language-based Persuasion Games, by Eilam Shapira and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.LG < prev | next > new | recent | 2024-01 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI cs.CL cs.GT cs.HC References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? ) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? ) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? ) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? ) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? ) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? ) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? ) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? ) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? ) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? ) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate ( What is Replicate? ) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? ) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? ) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? ) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? ) IArxiv recommender toggle IArxiv Recommender ( What is IArxiv? ) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs . Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? ) We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders , member institutions , , and all contributors. About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab) Major funding support from

Related documents

Record · ID 612717 · SHA-256 79b0b52c6e943ef6
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive