arXiv (All)
open access
Accounting for Bias Enables Sustainable LLM Evaluation
LLM-as-a-judge has become the de facto standard for scalable, subjective evaluation, yet current leaderboards compensate for systematic measurement bias by running ever more comparisons, an approach that is both statistically unsound and computationally wasteful. The root cause is an incomplete meas
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- JEV-as-a-Judge: Accept When Confident, Escalate When Unsure#1062439
- JEV-as-a-Judge: Accept When Confident, Escalate When Unsure#1043135
- Mediocrity is the key for LLM as a Judge Anchor Selection#924523
- Mediocrity is the key for LLM as a Judge Anchor Selection#920292
- Judge Circuits Explain Format-Induced Inconsistency in LLM-as-a-Judge#987675
Record · ID 1105742
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive