arXiv (All)
open access
Towards Understanding LLM-Based Log Anomaly Detection: An Empirical Study of Performance, Efficiency, and Robustness
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated promising performance in log anomaly detection, yet how their adaptation strategies, architectures, and deployment configurations affect detection effectiveness remains insufficiently understood. To investigate these factors, we conduct a systematic emp
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- LogICL: Demonstration Retrieval to Bridge the Semantic Gap in Cross-Domain Log Anomaly Detection#1084089
- Agentic and LLM-Based Multimodal Anomaly Detection: Architectures, Challenges, and Prospects.#143460
- Uncertainty Quantification for LLM Agents: A Taxonomy, an Evaluation Protocol, and an Empirical Study#984321
- Beyond Heavy Log Curation: Perplexity-Based APT Detection via Unsupervised, Context-Augmented Language Models#394318
- Evaluating LLMs on Conversational Text-to-SQL under Chain Ambiguity and Intent Drift#798188
Record · ID 1106070
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive