arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Beyond AI Literacy: A Structured Review and Exploratory Meta-Analysis of Measures for Competent Generative-AI Use
Researchers assessing competent generative-AI use at work must choose among self-reports, objective tests, and measures of oversight and reliance. We conducted a structured, seeded review of 24 focal empirical publications, starting from the 2024 COSMIN-based review and adding a targeted update thro
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Metaheutagogy: A Framework for AI-Mediated Metacognitive Learning#123749
- From predictive algorithms to generative intelligence: a decadal bibliometric mapping of global research frontiers in AI-driven mental health (2016-2025).#436855
- Assessment Validity and Generative AI#331605
- Knowing When to Critique: Task-Adaptive Metacognitive Regulation for Reliable LLM Reasoning#1118403
- The Role of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Developing Cognitive and Research Talent Among Postgraduate Students.#140530
Record · ID 1109609
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive