arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Before You Poll with LLMs: A Deliberative Diagnostic Framework
Can LLMs reason through new information like humans, or do they merely retrieve cached opinions? This is critical for silicon sampling, where LLM personas simulate public opinion at scale. Current evaluations test only whether personas hold the right opinions -- a static snapshot. But opinion resear
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Categorizing judgments as likely to be selected by intuition or deliberation#87741
- Sentience matters, but we don’t know how much: Comments on Jonathan Birch, The Edge of Sentience.#722782
- An Experimental Paradigm for Evaluating Shared Agency in Humans and LLMs#263546
- From Simulated Citizens to Simulated Deliberation: Challenges in Representation and Interaction#984486
- Aplicación móvil con tecnología machine learning para la gestión de proyectos en una empresa constructora#260471
Record · ID 1109887
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive