ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison Between Two Types of Meshes Used in Pelvic Organs Prolapse Procedures
Using partially absorbed meshes in pelvic reconstructive surgery will involve fewer postoperative complications especially less pain caused by the mesh mass.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Pilot Study to Investigate the Efficacy of Partially Absorbable Mesh in Patients With Pelvic Organ Prolapsed#1047697
- Restorelle® Mesh Versus Native Tissue Repair for Prolapse#887997
- Vaginal Adventitia Reserved and Anatomical Implant Technique of Transvaginal Mesh Procedure for Pelvic Organ Prolapse#860546
- Pectopexy Surgery Without Mesh#1096192
- The Use of Different Types of Mesh for Prevention of Incisional Hernia Versus Primary Abdominal Suturing#1029979
Record · ID 1111618
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive