ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Restorelle® Mesh Versus Native Tissue Repair for Prolapse
The purpose of this study is to collect information on the safety and effectiveness of Restorelle Direct Fix mesh and the surgical procedure to implant Restorelle. These results will be compared to the safety and effectiveness results in patients who have native tissue repair (without mesh) as their pelvic organ prolapse treatment.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison Between Two Types of Meshes Used in Pelvic Organs Prolapse Procedures#1111618
- A Pilot Study to Investigate the Efficacy of Partially Absorbable Mesh in Patients With Pelvic Organ Prolapsed#1047697
- Vaginal Adventitia Reserved and Anatomical Implant Technique of Transvaginal Mesh Procedure for Pelvic Organ Prolapse#860546
- Flat Polypropylene Mesh in the Treatment of Uterine and Recurrent or Advanced Pelvic Organ Prolapse#1007244
- Randomized Trial of Interrupted Versus Continuous Vaginal Closure of Anterior Repair With Mesh#980072
Record · ID 887997
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive