ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Early Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Oesophageal Replacement Versus Open Surgery in Children
a comparative prospective study of postoperative between minimally invasive and open surgery complications for esophageal replacement in children
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Open Versus Laparoscopically-assisted Esophagectomy for Cancer#834690
- Adebrelimab Combined With Nab-paclitaxel, Oxaliplatin and Tegafur (AOS) for Perioperative Treatment of Locally Advanced Resectable GC/GEJ#891891
- Application of Bronchial Blocker in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery#1096573
- Severe Complications After Gastrectomy for Esophagogastric Junction and Gastric Cancer#888343
- Efficacy and Safety Study of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer#857170
Record · ID 1112032
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive