arXiv (All)
open access
Be Careful Who You Trust: Coordination Dynamics under Corrupted Communication in LLM Multi-Agent Games
Large language models are increasingly used as interacting agents, but it remains unclear how robust their coordination is when public communication is unreliable. We study this question in iterated $N$-player Stag Hunt games played by homogeneous LLM groups under controlled programmatic action inve
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Coordination Games over Belief–Action Geometry: Structural Limits of Coordination under Representational Incompatibility#118184
- Dicey games: Shared sources of randomness in distributed systems#449044
- Shapley-based Data Valuation for LLM Alignment via Sequential Preference Optimization#1116179
- The Cost of Coordination: Why Multi-Agent LLMs Explore More But Discover Less#368869
- Checking Cheap Talk#1116080
Record · ID 1115660
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive