PhilArchive
open access
Coordination Games over Belief–Action Geometry: Structural Limits of Coordination under Representational Incompatibility
This working paper introduces Coordination Games over Belief–Action Geometry (CG-BAG), a formal framework for analyzing collective coordination among agents with heterogeneous representations of belief, value, and action. The paper develops the core definitions, structural admissibility conditions, and stability concepts underlying CG-BAG, including the notion of coordination-stable outcomes and critical representational bases.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The interdisciplinary study of coordination#6617
- The possibility of collective moral obligations#766456
- Salience reasoning in coordination games#766363
- Be Careful Who You Trust: Coordination Dynamics under Corrupted Communication in LLM Multi-Agent Games#1115660
- Role differentiation as ignition of a collective information engine: Structuration in Agent Populations#998396
Record · ID 118184
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive