arXiv (All)
open access
Reasoning Concentrates Errors, and Self-Consistency Never Notices
Self-consistency assumes that independent samples disagree when a model is unsure, so agreement is evidence of correctness. Holding weights fixed and toggling only a reasoning mode, over five benchmarks and 74,944 samples, we show that reasoning concentrates a model's errors: the probability that tw
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Reasoning as Pattern Matching: Shared Mechanisms in Human and LLM Everyday Reasoning#1155231
- Diversity Combining for Multi-Path LLM Reasoning#1143430
- Answer-Distribution Trajectories: A Stochastic-Dynamics View of LLM Reasoning#668034
- R2VC: Modular Fact-Checking with Retrieval, Verification, and Confidence Calibration#999939
- Do Reasoning Representations Help Humans Evaluate LLM Outputs?#986647
Record · ID 1115991
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive