arXiv (All)
open access
CG-Diff: Organizing Code Changes Around Call Graphs
Tools for code review present code changes file-by-file. We argue that, oftentimes, changes can be better organized around a call graph of the changed code. From an empirical study of GitHub pull requests (PRs) in-the-wild, we find that (1) in around 40% of the PRs, more than half of the changed fun
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- How Developers Adopt, Use, and Evolve CI/CD Caching: An Empirical Study on GitHub Actions#14104
- Why Do Pull Requests Go Silent? Uncovering the Barriers to Contribution Completion in Open-Source Code Review#1037308
- Why Do Pull Requests Go Silent? Uncovering the Barriers to Contribution Completion in Open-Source Code Review#1028782
- CODEFUSE-DEBENCH: An Empirical Study on Readability, Recompilability, and Functionality#238518
- The Hidden Cost of Reproducibility: Commercial Software Dependency in Published Research and the Version Accessibility Gap#626791
Record · ID 1116013
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive