arXiv (All)
open access
Why They Disagree: Decoding Differences in Opinions about AI Risk
Identifying the reasons for disagreements between influential points of view on issues that affect the public can help produce informed policy responses, even if they do not bring disagreeing parties closer to agreement. We present a methodology for extracting reasoning chains - the sequences of pre
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Measuring AI Accountability Through Argumentation Analysis: Can Model Reasoning Withstand Scrutiny?#972039
- Evaluating the Capabilities of LLMs for Persuasive Dialogue#798369
- Evaluating the Capabilities of LLMs for Persuasive Dialogue#796956
- Moral Disagreement and the Limits of AI Value Alignment: a dual challenge of epistemic justification and political legitimacy#113449
- Democratic ICAI: Debating Our Way to Steering Principles from Preferences#925191
Record · ID 1116175
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive