arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Evaluating the Capabilities of LLMs for Persuasive Dialogue
Large language models (LLMs) can generate apparently highly persuasive text, but does sounding persuasive mean arguing well? We introduce \textsc{Persuasio}, a multi-agent dialogue platform grounded in a formal argumentation-based theory of persuasion dialogues that adjudicates logical winners durin
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Evaluating the Capabilities of LLMs for Persuasive Dialogue#798369
- PersuaRL: Reinforcement Learning-Driven Multi-Expert Selection for Persuasive Dialogue Generation in Insurance#821154
- Benchmarking Argumentative Behaviour of LLMs: A Study of Defences Against Character Attacks#1076329
- Argument Quality Assessment with Large Language Models: A Pairwise Bradley-Terry Approach#819377
- Argument Quality Assessment with Large Language Models: A Pairwise Bradley-Terry Approach#809384
Record · ID 796956
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive