arXiv (All)
open access
Contamination, Prior, or Evidence? Decomposing and Training Evidence Use in Whole-Slide Vision-Language Models
Pathology vision-language models (VLMs) are conventionally evaluated by accuracy, but accuracy alone does not measure evidence use: it may conflate dataset contamination, prior knowledge, and image evidence. In a motivating study of lymph-node metastasis prediction, we found that most public patholo
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Med-AR: Autoregressive Vision-Language Pretraining for Long-Tailed Chest X-Ray Classification and Uncertainty-Aware Evaluation#1077085
- Characterizing Text Branch Sensitivity in Medical Vision-Language Segmentation via Evidence Decoupling#987839
- EviPathBench: Benchmarking Evidence Acquisition and Reasoning in Vision-Language Models for Whole-Slide Pathology#670694
- EviPathBench: Benchmarking Evidence Acquisition and Reasoning in Vision-Language Models for Whole-Slide Pathology#668629
- A visual large language foundational model for medical image recognition using clinician-contributed online resources#1034776
Record · ID 1116516
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive