arXiv (All)
open access
Measurement Boundaries in LLM Financial Agent Evaluation: Fixed-Tape Execution and Multi-Defect Auditing
and-scienceartificial-intelligencecomputational-engineeringfinancemachine-learningsoftware-engineering
What controls are needed to interpret execution performance and audit scores in LLM agent evaluations? We study two limits on these interpretations in a financial agent harness. In Study~A, comparing independent runs under idealized and stressed execution on three synthetic settings that share one 2
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- How does Adversarial Influence Scale in Multi-Agent Systems?#1078099
- How to Speculate about Uncertainty in Agentic Coding? A Draft-Model Gate Method#660804
- How to Speculate about Uncertainty in Agentic Coding? A Draft-Model Gate Method#972210
- Complexity-Aware Evaluation of LLM Comprehension#1141727
- Complexity-Aware Evaluation of LLM Comprehension#1122361
Record · ID 1116710
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive