arXiv (All)
open access
Are Vision-Language-Action Models Robust to One-Step Observation Perturbations?
Understanding the safety risks of vision-language-action (VLA) models is essential for their deployment in the physical world. Existing safety research has mainly considered persistent perturbations that are applied continuously to observations throughout an episode. However, momentary observation c
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Blackout vs. Freeze: Analyzing Physical Failure Modes of VLAs under Camera Faults#1144112
- FailureSpot: Label-Efficient Timestamp-Level Failure Detection for Vision-Language-Action Models#927575
- ProAct-VLM: Pre-Failure Vision-Language Task Replanning with Continuous Perception Feedback#1141994
- Perturbation-Based Epistemic Uncertainty for Failure Detection in Vision-Language-Action Models#800081
- Detect Before You Leap: Mirage Detection in Vision-Language Models#1012219
Record · ID 1116881
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive