arXiv (All)
open access
Tool Calling is Linearly Readable and Steerable in Language Models
Language-model agents can take real actions by calling tools, so choosing the wrong tool can cause errors that are difficult to undo. Most evaluations only observe the tool choice after the model generates a call. We read this choice from the model before generation, and we steer it. For each tool,
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- SFT or RL for Tool-Calling Agents? A Controlled Study Across Data, Method, and Scale#1011563
- PDEU-Bench: Benchmarking the Personalized Planning Lifecycle of Tool-Calling LLM Agents#1129540
- AsyncTool: Evaluating the Asynchronous Function Calling Capability under Multi-Task Scenarios#800039
- Low Reasoning Effort Is Enough for Routine Office Work by Language-Model Agents#1131631
- DAREBench: Deployment-Aware and Reliable Evaluation of Models as Agents#973669
Record · ID 1117402
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive