arXiv (All)
open access
Low Reasoning Effort Is Enough for Routine Office Work by Language-Model Agents
Purpose: Developers choose how much a language-model agent reasons before it acts. Some pick a high level for fear that a low one is not enough, and pay for it in tokens, time and overthinking. We tested whether a low level is enough for routine office work. Methods: Two tiers of GPT-5.6 did 14 rout
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Beyond the Illusion: Load Minimization Theory as a Countermeasure to Reasoning Model Limitations in Complex Problems#716607
- Streamlined Reflective Evolution for Task-Adaptive Self-Refinement Pipelines#1116789
- AsyncTool: Evaluating the Asynchronous Function Calling Capability under Multi-Task Scenarios#800039
- Tool Calling is Linearly Readable and Steerable in Language Models#1117402
- Leveraging Language Models for Log Statement Generation in Multilingual Scenarios: How Far Are We?#229584
Record · ID 1131631
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive