arXiv (All)
open access
Safety Paradox: How Enhanced Safety Awareness Leaves LLMs Vulnerable to Posterior Attack
Large language models (LLMs) are rigorously aligned to refuse harmful requests, a process that inherently cultivates a latent capacity to evaluate and recognize unsafe content. In this work, we reveal that this advanced safety awareness inadvertently introduces a fatal vulnerability. We introduce Po
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Safety Beyond the Interface: Detecting Harm via Latent States in Large Language Models#1014066
- Safety Beyond the Interface: Detecting Harm via Latent States in Large Language Models#978372
- Semantic Fibers and Cross-Gram Interference: A Calculus of Safety Drift in Overcomplete Representations#1084775
- Layerwise Convergence Fingerprints for Runtime Misbehavior Detection in Large Language Models#138823
- Are Vision-Language-Action Models Robust to One-Step Observation Perturbations?#1116881
Record · ID 1117452
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive