arXiv (All)
open access
Diagnosing Sampled LLM Reasoning in Formal Geometry: Coverage, Realization, and Validity Evidence
Repeated sampling can reveal a correct numerical answer without yielding either a reliable system output or a supported derivation. We present Coverage, Realization, and Validity Evidence (CRV), an evaluation protocol for sampled large language model (LLM) reasoning over formal geometry states. Cove
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Autoformalizing Argumentative Material Inferences#1123398
- Neuro-Formal Verification: Agentic Language-Agnostic Formal Program Reasoning#1084328
- Official Review · ICLR 2026#787116
- On Reasoning-Centric LLM-based Automated Theorem Proving#124126
- (Auto)formalization is supposed to be easy: Trellis process semantics for spelling out rigorous proofs#267690
Record · ID 1117636
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive