arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Autoformalizing Argumentative Material Inferences
Natural language arguments are compelling before they are formally explicit. A premise supports a claim through defeasible warrants, background commitments, and exception conditions that the text leaves implicit. However, formal verification requires the opposite. Making such arguments machine-check
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Adaptive Proof Refinement with LLM-Guided Strategy Selection#997450
- Proof Theoretic Semantics Blocks Pathological Self-Reference#96585
- Diagnosing Sampled LLM Reasoning in Formal Geometry: Coverage, Realization, and Validity Evidence#1117636
- Natural Language based Specification and Verification#178824
- If a man buys a horse, … you have no argument against material implication: On a flaw in the foundations of the restrictor approach to conditionals#702951
Record · ID 1123398
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive