arXiv (All)
open access
Beyond Calibration: Do a Typed-Decision Model's Probabilities Obey the Probability Axioms?
Typed-decision models such as TypeSafe's Jev answer a declared yes/no or multiple-choice question about a state with a probability instead of text, and their evaluations report accuracy and calibration. Neither requires that the probabilities a model gives to logically related questions fit together
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Consistency Without Alignment: Item-Sensitive Language Models Indistinguishable From Random#820011
- Of marbles and matchsticks#95717
- LAVOIR: Teaching a Single-Pass Decision Encoder When and What to Ask with Amortized Value of Information#1105265
- The Ontological Limits of Probability and the Statistical Imperative of the World#696613
- Judgement and Rational Theory-Choice#765140
Record · ID 1117921
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive