arXiv (All)
open access
Untangling Input Language from Reasoning Language: A Diagnostic Framework for Cross-Lingual Moral Alignment in LLMs
When LLMs judge moral dilemmas, do they reach different conclusions in different languages, and if so, why? Two factors could drive such differences: the language of the dilemma itself, or the language in which the model reasons. Standard evaluation conflates these by testing only matched conditions
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Critical or Compliant? The Double-Edged Sword of Reasoning in Chain-of-Thought Explanations#1129140
- From Constitutions to Control: Interpretable Rewards for Aligning Language Models#1117798
- Why Aligned AI Requires Structural Pluralism#204280
- Why do we need to employ exemplars in moral education? Insights from recent advances in research on artificial intelligence#118805
- Unifying morality’s influence on non-moral judgments: The relevance of alternative possibilities#760505
Record · ID 1118463
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive