arXiv (All)
open access
Critical or Compliant? The Double-Edged Sword of Reasoning in Chain-of-Thought Explanations
Explanations are often promoted as tools for transparency, but they can also foster confirmation bias; users may assume reasoning is correct whenever outputs appear acceptable. We study this double-edged role of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) explanations in multimodal moral scenarios by systematically pert
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Mental Models and Affective States as Motivational Drivers#103152
- Unifying morality’s influence on non-moral judgments: The relevance of alternative possibilities#760505
- On the Context Sensitivity of LLM Moral Judgment#985030
- Untangling Input Language from Reasoning Language: A Diagnostic Framework for Cross-Lingual Moral Alignment in LLMs#1118463
- Certainties and the Bedrock of Moral Reasoning: Three Ways the Spade Turns#107037
Record · ID 1129140
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive