arXiv (All)
open access
Making AI Scientists Auditable from Evidence to Claim
AI research systems can report improved results without establishing that the tested implementation matches the method described in their conclusions. We introduce Xcientist, a research harness that connects literature review, component-based idea generation, experiment validation and reporting. An
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Evaluation of Elicit, SciSpace and Nested Knowledge in replicating three systematic reviews#976910
- Generating Interesting Scientific Ideas using Knowledge Graphs and LLMs: Evaluations with 100 Research Group Leaders#1077821
- Quantitative Evidence Mining for Plausibility-Aware Biomedical AI#799597
- PRISMA-LLM: An Empirical Reporting Framework for AI-Assisted Systematic Reviews#1069958
- GeneKnow: An auditable AI framework for source-grounded biological evidence synthesis#474674
Record · ID 1118610
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive