arXiv (All)
open access
Evidence-Inference Reconstruction: When The Evidence Is Recalled But The Reasoning Goes Wrong
Modern multi-hop LLM agents are equipped with built-in mechanisms to detect errors in intermediate reasoning steps. Such errors trigger corrective actions from these agents, which mostly follow the paradigm of retrying the steps or the reasoning trajectories. Not only are these retries expensive, we
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Backbone-Adaptive Evidence Routing for Robust Pairwise LLM Judging#1105310
- Can LLM-as-a-Judge Reliably Verify Rubrics in Agentic Scenarios?#821932
- Evidence and Inductive Inference#718634
- What are Key Factors for Updates in RL for LLM Reasoning?#1036727
- The mathematical machinery of causal inference: from data to decision advantage#78232
Record · ID 1118851
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive