arXiv (All)
open access
Can LLM-as-a-Judge Reliably Verify Rubrics in Agentic Scenarios?
Rubric-based scoring has become a widely used paradigm in model evaluation, typically with LLM-as-a-Judge (LaaJ) for rubric scoring. However, the reliability of LaaJ for rubric scoring remains underexplored. This concern is especially pronounced in agentic scenarios, where long, complex outputs furt
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Beyond Outcomes: Dual-View Relational Learning for Efficient Agent Benchmarking#1013066
- Beyond Outcomes: Dual-View Relational Learning for Efficient Agent Benchmarking#965454
- AgentAtlas: Beyond Outcome Leaderboards for LLM Agents#216916
- Evidence-Inference Reconstruction: When The Evidence Is Recalled But The Reasoning Goes Wrong#1118851
- JEV vs. LLMs as Rubric Judges: Cheaper, Faster, and Wrong in the Same Places#1077696
Record · ID 821932
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive