PsyArXiv
metadata only
Fact-Checking Using AI
Large language models (LLMs) can both correct inaccurate beliefs (1, 2, 3) and manipulate attitudes (4, 5, 6). As LLMs are increasingly deployed as fact-checkers on social media, their impact depends not only on the models’ technical capability, but also on the choices of their designers and the att
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Fact-Checking Using AI#1148311
- Fact-Checking Using AI#1081550
- Can LLMs Follow Medical Expert Logic? A Benchmark for Hierarchical Logical Consistency in Risk-of-Bias Assessment#998734
- Moloch's Bargain: Emergent Misalignment When LLMs Compete for Audiences#1156216
- LLMs learn different forms of metacognition when trained to predict their own accuracy#1118959
Record · ID 1148234
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive