arXiv (All)
open access
Toward a Graded Measure of Belief Stability in Large Language Models
Large language models (LLMs) increasingly mediate how people access and reason with information, yet factual reliability is usually evaluated one judgment at a time. We introduce graded belief stability, a relational measure of how well a belief persists within an LLM's broader belief system. Unlike
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Breaking the Illusion of Review Reliability under Static Evaluation: SCOPE Fuzzing for LLM-based Scientific Reviewers#1132298
- From Rubrics to Reliable Scores: Evidence-Grounded Text Evaluation with LLM Judges#987553
- When and Why Do Linear Bias Probes Fail? A Geometric and Statistical Theory of Bias Detectability in Large Language Model Representations#1037020
- SEPAL: Separated Expert Pairs with Answer-Level Fusion for Reliable LLM Collaboration#1144612
- The Unreliable Progress Bar: Can LLM Agents Reliably Report Task Progress Throughout Execution?#985929
Record · ID 1119231
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive