arXiv (All)
open access
ControlScope: Workflow Revision and Reliability in LLM Agents
How much of a running workflow should a language model agent revise? ControlScope compares continuing generated code, editing the next tool call's data arguments, and replacing the unfinished workflow from the same public execution state. The nested permissions separate available repairs from the ac
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- ControlScope: Workflow Revision and Reliability in LLM Agents#1108840
- Are controlled unitaries helpful?#163177
- RobustSGPO: Search-Space Control for Agent Harness Evolution#987980
- Libra: Efficient Resource Management for Agentic RL Post-Training#1011120
- CONTINUITY WITHOUT MEMORY Multi-Platform Linked Public Building and the Architecture of Stateless AI Work#696603
Record · ID 1119386
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive