CanLII
metadata only
Salha v. Canada (Attorney General)
Decided: 2026-09-25. Docket: T-3203-24. Citation: 2026 FC 1198 (CanLII). Administrative law — Procedural fairness — CRA pandemic benefits review — Whether Officer had to warn documents insufficient and allow further response — Opportunity to be heard and case to be met — No obligation to provide a running score — Telephone call identified concerns and invited further documents — Duty of fairness at low end — Application for judicial review dismissed | Administrative law — Reasonableness review — CERB and CRB eligibility reconsideration — Whether Officer reasonably assessed evidence of self-employment income — Credibility concerns with invoices, deposits, and lack of business expenses — Officer’s notes forming part of reasons (Crook v Canada (Attorney General)) — Justification, intelligibil
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Quebec (Attorney General) v. Lalande#638337
- Hancock v. Canada (Attorney General)#1001759
- Khalil v. Canada (Attorney General)#1120799
- Plourde v Manitoba (Prosecution Service)#638474
- DesRoches v. Canada#1158532
Record · ID 1120800
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive