Hancock v. Canada (Attorney General)

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, fct, 2026canlii96668, 2026 canlii 96668 (fc), 2026, canlii, 96668, (fc), t-2003-26; t-2046-26; t-2023-26; t-2907-26; t-2190-26; t-2910-26; t-2002-26, 2026, procedure, judicial review, parties, federal courts rules, rule 303, subrule 303(1) prohibits naming the tribunal as respondent, whether attorney general of canada is the proper respondent where no other person directly affected, canadian judicial council as decision, maker, substitution ordered in each file, respondent substituted, procedure, case management, abeyance, federal courts rules, rules 3, 55, 385, whether seven related proceedings should be held in abeyance pending reconsideration decisions, overlapping evidence and coordinated schedule considered, prematurity and mootness concerns addressed, abeyance ordered, procedure, motions, written hearing, federal courts rules, rule 369, whether an oral hearing is required where motion brought in writing, discretion to decide on written materials despite request for oral hearing, nature and complexity assessed, no questions requiring oral hearing, motion determined in writing, procedure, costs, fixing costs, federal courts rules, rules 400, 401, tariff b, whether elevated costs warranted for unreasonably opposing motion, presumptive entitlement to costs as successful party, column 2 of tariff b applied, costs fixed and payable forthwith