PsyArXiv
metadata only
What does consistency reveal about credibility? Four meta-analyses
Inconsistency is often viewed as a sign of deception, whereas consistency is taken as evidence of credibility. However, experts disagree on the extent to which consistency cues can inform credibility judgments. We conducted meta-analyses on four types of consistency (within-statement, between-statem
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- What does consistency reveal about credibility? Four meta-analyses#16123
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses#6267
- Reasoning Concentrates Errors, and Self-Consistency Never Notices#1115991
- Disbelief is a distinct doxastic attitude#768754
- Towards Best Practice Framing of Uncertainty in Scientific Publications: A Review of Water Resources Research Abstracts#738263
Record · ID 1121258
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive