OSF
open access
Excuse Me, Judge, but You're Standing in the Way of My Healthcare: The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Halts Growth of Mid-Level Health Providers and Declares only Physicians Can Obtain Patient Consent in Shinal V. Toms
This Note examines the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania’s decision in Shinal v. Toms and argues that the court improperly barred physicians from using qualified staff to assist in obtaining informed consent. The Note contends that the MCARE Act permits delegation of the disclosure process so long as ph
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Colemon: Broad Reading of Innovative Clinical Leads to General Personal Jurisdiction Under Georgia's Long-Arm Statute#183613
- Informed consent, price transparency, and disclosure#92787
- Neuroscience v. privacy? : a democratic perspective#748224
- Is Consent-GPT valid? Public attitudes to generative AI use in surgical consent#211617
- Is Consent-GPT valid? Public attitudes to generative AI use in surgical consent#129244
Record · ID 1121352
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive