arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Benchmarking Factual Robustness of LLMs via Multi-conversation Persuasion
As Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly serve as primary knowledge retrieval interfaces, their robustness against \textit{persuasion attacks}---attempts to inject misinformation or enforce counterfactuals---has become a critical safety concern. Existing red-teaming frameworks typically evaluate
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Knowing When to Critique: Task-Adaptive Metacognitive Regulation for Reliable LLM Reasoning#1118403
- Beyond Fluency: A Human-Centered Evaluation Rubric for Grounding, Answerability, and Reliability in LLM Outputs#118367
- CART: Closed-Loop Adaptive Red Teaming for Large Language Models#1063547
- Consensus and Factual Dynamics in Large Populations of Interacting Language Models#1144178
- Do Reasoning Representations Help Humans Evaluate LLM Outputs?#986647
Record · ID 1122778
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive