ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Accuracy of Maxilla Between Virtual and Conventional Surgical Planning in Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery
Study Title Comparison of Maxillary Accuracy Between Virtual and Conventional Surgical Planning in Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study Design * Type: Prospective, single-center, randomized, blinded, case-controlled trial * Location: National Hospital of Odonto-Stomatology, Ho Chi Minh City * Period: August 2023 - February 2025 * Sample size: 20 patients * Ethical approval: Granted by the University of Medicine and Pharmacy at HCMC (Approval No. 647/HĐĐĐ-ĐHYD) Inclusion Criteria * Patients aged 18-30 years * Diagnosed with malocclusion requiring bimaxillary orthognathic surgery * Completed presurgical orthodontic treatment Exclusion Criteria * Cleft lip/palate, craniofacial syndromes * Deformities due to trauma, tumors, or iatrogenic causes * TMJ disorders * History of previous orthognathic surgery * Planned multipiece Le Fort I osteotomy Randomization and Blinding * All patients underwent both 2D and 3D surgical planning. * Two splints (CSP and VSP) were fabricated for each patient. * Intraoperative randomization was performed by an OR nurse. * The surgical team and data analysts were blinded to group allocation. * Groups were revealed only after data analysis. Groups * Test group (VSP): 3D virtual planning, simulation, and 3D-printed splints * Control group (CSP): 2D cephalometric planning, model surgery, conventional resin splints Surgical Procedure * All patients underwent Le Fort I and BSSO * Maxilla-first approach with fixation using 4 miniplates * Mandibular repositioning using final splint and fixed with 2 miniplates per side * All surgeries performed by a single experienced surgeon Data Collection \& Measurements * CT scans before and 2 weeks after surgery * Superimposition using Invivo 7.0 software (voxel-based registration) * Measured landmark changes (A point, ANS, U1, U3, U6) in X (medial-lateral), Y (anterior-posterior), and Z (vertical) directions * Compared: * 2D plan (P2D) vs. 3D plan (P3D) * P3D vs. actual pos
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Orthognathic Surgery in Anterior Open Bite: a Retrospective Study of 50 Patients With Initial Tongue Malposition#1126316
- Functional Nasal Surgery at the Time of Le Fort I Osteotomy: A Prospective, Single-blind, Randomized Trial#1138472
- Expert consensus on treatment of condylar hyperplasia and secondary dento-maxillofacial deformities.#265564
- Facial Artery Musculomucosal Flap and Bone Volume Gain in Alveolar Cleft Repair"#1046739
- Implant-Abutment Interface Design on Bone and Soft Tissue Levels Around Implants Placed Using Different Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation#853644
Record · ID 1124643
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive