arXiv (All)
open access
When Does Structured Knowledge Help Neural Theorem Proving?
Does structured mathematical knowledge help LLMs prove theorems in Lean 4? If so, for which models, and does the answer vary by problem? Formal libraries such as Mathlib encode 285,000+ verified theorems with syntactic dependencies, but the semantic layer mathematicians rely on for discovery (analog
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Magnets, spins, and neurons: The dissemination of model templates across disciplines#745666
- Evidence-Inference Reconstruction: When The Evidence Is Recalled But The Reasoning Goes Wrong#1118851
- What are Key Factors for Updates in RL for LLM Reasoning?#1036727
- Can Computation from Earlier Problems Help LLMs Solve New Ones?#1144361
- How Many Thoughts Can a Vector Hold? The Capacity of Reasoning by Superposition#1083251
Record · ID 1128730
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive