arXiv (All)
open access
Fair Fact-Checking: Closing the Cross-Lingual Gap in LLM Factual Judgement with RoSh
Misinformation on social media remains a critical problem, and more and more people settle it by asking a language model instead of a fact checker. Whether models judge such claims reliably is debated; whether they judge them equally well in every language people ask in has gone almost unasked. We t
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Can LLMs Follow Medical Expert Logic? A Benchmark for Hierarchical Logical Consistency in Risk-of-Bias Assessment#998734
- Language, Form, and Logic: In Pursuit of Natural Logic's Holy Grail#112137
- Says Block, Still Acts: Why LLM Safety Judgments Fail to Govern Action in LLM Agents#1130712
- Expressing belief with evidentials: A case study with Cuzco Quechua on the dispensability of illocutionary explanation#715184
- Verbal tics in frontier language models: A critical review of current releases, research evidence, and public discussion#1155172
Record · ID 1128937
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive