arXiv (All)
open access
Rescaling Confidence: What Scale Design Reveals About LLM Metacognition
Verbalized confidence, in which LLMs report a numerical certainty score, is widely used to estimate uncertainty in black-box settings, yet the confidence scale itself (typically 0--100) is rarely examined. We show that this design choice is not neutral. Across six LLMs and three datasets, verbalized
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Elaboration Drift: How Human–LLM Interaction Erodes Epistemic Traction#91604
- A measure of metacognitive bias you can be confident in#146618
- Confidence Tracks Consciousness#728027
- Measuring (some aspects of) the metacognition of AI#1129212
- Beyond Answer Confidence: A Controlled Audit of Self-Knowledge in a Black-Box Decision Model#1155941
Record · ID 999206
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive