arXiv (All)
open access
When Choices Become Risks: Safety Failures of Large Language Models under Multiple-Choice Constraints
We identify and systematically characterize a class of task-structural alignment failures in large language models (LLMs): even when the harmful intent remains unchanged, changing the task presentation and output constraints can substantially alter model safety behavior. Specifically, when a harmful
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- DeShortcut-Align: Decoupling Spurious Shortcuts for Robust Safety Alignment in Large Reasoning Models#1129507
- AgentBoundary: Counterfactual Evaluation of Safety in Tool-Using LLM Agents#1118731
- Consistency Without Alignment: Item-Sensitive Language Models Indistinguishable From Random#820011
- From Constitutions to Control: Interpretable Rewards for Aligning Language Models#1117798
- Benchmarking the Benchmarks: Evaluating Automated Safety Benchmarks for Small Language Models#463173
Record · ID 1129227
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive