arXiv (All)
open access
Rethinking Circuit Evaluation: Do Circuits Explain Model Errors?
Mechanistic interpretability (MI) aims to explain a model's behaviour through analyzing its internal computations; circuit-based explanations aim to isolate these computations with compact subnetworks validated by ablating the rest of the model. We show that circuits validated this way may fail to r
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Rethinking Circuit Evaluation: Do Circuits Explain Model Errors?#1108755
- CircuitKIT : Circuit Discovery, Evaluation, and Application Toolkit for Mechanistic Interpretability#386855
- Are We Recovering Mechanisms? Objective-Level Recovery Gaps in Mechanistic Interpretability#1161035
- Are We Recovering Mechanisms? Objective-Level Recovery Gaps in Mechanistic Interpretability#1157446
- Certified Mechanistic Interpretability: Lifting Single-Input Findings to Bounded Neighbourhoods#1062015
Record · ID 1130338
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive