arXiv (All)
open access
Are We Recovering Mechanisms? Objective-Level Recovery Gaps in Mechanistic Interpretability
Mechanistic interpretability aims to recover the internal computations responsible for model behavior. Progress in automated circuit discovery is often framed as a search problem: better attribution or optimization should identify better mechanisms. This assumes that the evaluation objective can rec
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Are We Recovering Mechanisms? Objective-Level Recovery Gaps in Mechanistic Interpretability#1161035
- Rethinking Circuit Evaluation: Do Circuits Explain Model Errors?#1130338
- Rethinking Circuit Evaluation: Do Circuits Explain Model Errors?#1108755
- MechBench: Can AI Scientific Agents Discover Mechanisms Beyond Phenomenal Laws?#1130096
- Autonomous Chemical Mechanistic Discovery through Agentic Reasoning and Validation#998699
Record · ID 1157446
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive