arXiv (All)
open access
SameFact: The Same Safety Facts Lead to Different Responses Across Interfaces
Safety evaluations often ask whether a model recognizes that an action is unsafe, whereas agent evaluations ask what the model chooses to do. Using safety judgments as evidence about action selection therefore raises a measurement question: does the influence of the same safety-relevant fact persist
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Says Block, Still Acts: Why LLM Safety Judgments Fail to Govern Action in LLM Agents#1130712
- Safety Theatre And The Suppression of Agency#726728
- Models That Know How Evaluations Are Designed Score Safer#984168
- SafeAtlas-VL: Beyond Binary Multimodal Safety with Large-Scale Data and Guard Models#793321
- SafeAtlas-VL: Beyond Binary Multimodal Safety with Large-Scale Data and Guard Models#789317
Record · ID 1130714
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive